Thursday, March 5, 2020

Faculty School Models

Faculty School Models Introduction Accreditation is mainly concerned with the improvement of quality services in institutions by pointing out how shared governance works in relation to the institution’s structure and functioning. Endorsement of an academic institute by the Commission of Colleges implies that the institution has an appropriate purpose in regards to higher education, and has services, resources and programs to achieve its mission.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on Faculty School Models specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More For instance, the continuity of an institution is solely dependent on its team of staff and learning facilitates to offer quality education to a generation after the other. Shared governance fully integrates core values and beliefs with the aim of delivering quality education, improving on the educational environment, and producing highly skilled graduates. The sole purpose of this essay is to id entify, which is the best faculty senate model that best fits the community college, and to determine its applicability in its shared governance structure. Apparently, it emerges that shared governance is more prevalent now than it was 30 years ago. This is contrary to conformist belief that faculty roles in shared governance are declining in recent decades (Birnbaum, 2004). Shared governance has instead been widely credited for its effectiveness in achieving laudable goals. In reference to (Tierney Minor, 2003) at least 82% of masters students agreed that shared governance is important in delivering values and identity in an institution. Besides that, shared governance receives an overwhelming support of about ninety six percent from all the three constituent groups. The best minor faculty senate model must in some degree involve the governance in decision making and especially in academic matters to produce significantly praiseworthy results. The best faculty senate model that fi ts the community college is the influential model. It should not only appear convincing, but it should be effective in delivering the set goals and results. Thus, it should not only be a model, but also an effective one such that it will achieve the set target, which had been agreed upon. It should be influential rather than a ceremonial kind of model.Advertising Looking for research paper on education? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More For the community college to achieve an influential senate model, it is necessary to put a lot of effort in this venture. Minor James illustrated that it is very easy for an influential senate model to turn ceremonial even with the best laid intentions. In most cases, the faculty model senates are viewed negatively especially as being obstructing, underperforming and dysfunctional. Senates that are influential, (Minor, 2003) have the following characteristics, they are build on the fou ndations of trust, and have a shared or collaborative relationship with the administrators. For college community to have such kind of faculty senate (Influential) the presidential and administrative authority must not dominate issues, and there should be proper and open communication between faculty and administrators. The college should also have decentralized governance devoid of strong traditions of a leadership characterized with a top-down model. If this is not so, then it might just end up being a ceremonial model. The result would be a discontented faculty. If the faculty does not have the above mentioned elements, then it does not have an influential kind of faculty senate model. The best faculty model in this case, the influential model should be in position to meet more than the obvious needs of the college. Burgan points out that it should be in a place to provide great opportunities for the college stability even in the most volatile situations, provide a room for socia lization, discussion, professional screening, if it dos not produce such listed results, then the institution cannot claim to have an influential kind of faculty senate. A ceremonial model might meet the needs of some of faculty members, but what the community college must work hard to ensure are the needs of almost everyone at the college. In addition, the needs of the institution itself also ought to be met. Truly, what can best achieve this is the influential senate model. The influential model is able to ascertain the reputation and prestige of a college. When the senate is effective, it demonstrates features of an elitist institution and demonstrates willingness to achieve academic excellence and professional standards (Tierney William, 2004). The senate model in question must be in position to contribute to the institution’s academic mission besides meeting its aspirations.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on Faculty School Models specific ally for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Therefore, community college should draw a strategy depending on how it might raise its standards in the community, and work towards establishing an influential type of faculty senate. If the senate model is an influential force to reckon with in the college, then this indicates that the college has this type of faculty senate. Conclusion Community colleges and other academic institutions should acknowledge that one single faculty model is not effective; rather the academic institutions should seek to work with multiple models to achieve the set goals for their institution. It is possible to work with multiple models if the institutions remain focused, work with a common agenda, and come to a consensus on the core mission and values. References Birnbaum, R. (2004). The end of shared governance: Looking ahead or looking  back. Journals of New Directions for Higher Education (127). Burgan, M. (2006). What Ever Happen ed to the Faculty? Drift and Decision in Higher  Education. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press. Minor, J. James, T. (2003). Assessing the senate: Critical issues considered. American Educational Review journal, (26) 1. 264-272. Tierney, William, G. (2004). Improving academic governance: Utilizing a cultural Order. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.

Tuesday, February 18, 2020

International transportation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

International transportation - Essay Example and services; delivering products and services; and managing customer service) and management and support services (development and management of human capital; managing information technology; managing financial resources; acquisition, construction and management of property; managing Environmental Health and Safety; managing external relationships; and managing knowledge, improvement and change). In this regard, the PCF model has strong and direct links to logistics management activities which are most evident in the delivery of products and services within the operating process phase. As such, since the motor carriage under land transportation is the most commonly and widely used, affordable and accessible mode of transportation across all industries, organizations and countries, this mode of transportation plays a significant role in the PCF model for supply chain management. Governing rules, regulations are simple and universally known for motor carriages. Furthermore, motor transport is cheaper and costs associated with operating, maintaining and sustaining the vehicles for delivery are cheaper when compared to other modes of transportation. As emphasized, the PCF model contain process elements that are applicable to organizations regardless of industry, region and size; thereby, the use of the motor carriage parallel the model’s thrust in making effective delivery of products and services across industries, making its role important for easy and most affordable access in supply chain management of major organizations

Monday, February 3, 2020

Individual Reflective Report Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 2

Individual Reflective Report - Essay Example My group identified the huge potential in this sector. We plan to establish a company which deals with selling game prepaid cards to Chinese players. Why the Chinese? This card, which is top up for Chinese internet games, helps Chinese players who are out of their home country to access a reliable payment method in order to access their favourite games just as if they were in China. The Chinese internet banking needs are cumbersome unlike payment methods such as VISA. Our prepaid card makes the whole process of accessing one’s favourite game so much easier when the player is in a foreign country. There are a number of other companies providing a payment method though not exactly the same as ours. We will compete with them due to our projected lower price. This lower price is as a result of operational efficiency and cost associated with a smaller workforce capable of multitasking in different departments. We plan to retain all our customers due to our honesty policy by which w e work for the best interest of our customers. The staff should have good knowledge of internet gaming and online transactions. The company should create a website to facilitate online payments and also set real world stores. There are more than enough suppliers who would be willing and ready to increase our penetration into the target Chinese market via internet. Process of Idea Initiation The process of idea initiation was quite interesting. Each and every member of my group had an idea to propose. Some of the ideas were quite interesting but were quickly objected due to the existence of highly effective competitors. Other ideas were ruled out due to varied reasons such as lack of enough information about how prospective the to-be proposed business would be and lack of originality. After intense discussion on which idea our group would embark on, the group did not come up with a final decision. We decided to dismiss the group and meet on a later date. Every member of the group was supposed to refine his or her idea before the next meeting. On the following meeting, all members showed up. Some dismissed their previously proposed ideas due to reasons such as lack of enough information, them being not practical and low success potential. The group was left to choose between three ideas. Members of the group discussed on the specifics of the ideas before voting for the best idea of them all. A clear majority of the group members agreed on the game prepaid cards as the most lucrative and potentially successful business idea. The occurrences of the process of idea initiation match content of literature. Brainstorming is one of the most common ways of coming up with new ideas. Pinson (2008, p. 21) advises that immediate decision on the best business idea should not be immediately made since brainstorming lacks the virtue of enough information. Group members should dig deeper into knowing facts and other relevant information of their proposed ideas before reaching a n agreement. Making a decision straight away after a brainstorming process may result to the dismissal of the idea due to poor project fundamentals later on after time and other resources have been invested in developing the business plan. Team Work I enjoyed the level of cooperation and the group’s synergy. Majority of the tasks assigned to group members were completed on time. This shows the dedication of individual in making the team work come out successful. Team members contributed in form of

Sunday, January 26, 2020

Union Carbide behind Gauley Bridge

Union Carbide behind Gauley Bridge The Gauley Bridge, West Virginia, was Americas greatest industrial catastrophe and has been hidden from most of the American public today.[1] In retrospect, it is incredible that the story of the digging of the tunnel near Gauley Bridge did not break until 1935. [2]Although much controversy was to surround the calculation of the projects human cost, a U.S. Public Health Service official testifying before a Congressional committee in 1961 put it at 476 dead and 1,500 disabled. Yet it took five years from the time construction began for nationwide attention to focus on the tragedy, and the full facts did not emerge until a year later in the course of a Congressional hearing. The deadly lung disease silicosis is caused when miners, sandblasters, and foundry and tunnel workers inhale fine particles of silica dust-a mineral found in sand, quartz, and granite. In 1935, approximately 1,500 workers-largely African Americans who had come north to find work-were killed by exposure to silica dust while building a tunnel in Gauley Bridge, West Virginia. Ordinarily, silicosis takes a several years to develop, but these West Virginia tunnel workers were falling ill in a matter of months because of exposure to unusually high concentrations of silica dust. The crisis over silicosis suddenly became a national issue, as seen in this article in the radical newspaper Peoples Press. [a]In 1936 congressional hearings on the Gauley Bridge disaster, it was revealed that company officials and engineers wore masks to protect themselves when they visited the tunnel, but they failed to provide masks for the tunnels themselves, even when the workers requested them. I can see that all of this was because a rich and powerful corporation valued dollars above lives. When the Rinehart Dennis, Co., contractors for the New-Kanawha Power Co., started tunneling through two mountains a mile east of Gauley Bridge, on a power project to cost millions, they had know the tunnel would go through silicate rock. They knew that men working in the tunnel would breathe in the dust. They knew that without protection they would get silicosis, deadly lung disease. Behind Rinehart Dennis was the New-Kanawha Power Co., set to build the tunnel, dissolved as soon as the tunnel was completed late in 1934.[3] Union Carbide Behind the New-Kanawha Power Co. is the Electro Metallurgical Co. This is the big company that will use and sell the New Kanawha power. Behind the Electro Metallurgical Co. is the Union Carbide Chemical Co., gigantic company spreading into many fields. Power to be won from the mountains and the rivers of West Virginia was behind the building of the tunnel at Hawks Nest, near Gauley Bridge. Dams, powerhouses, and a tunnel through the mountains to increase the drop in the New River and the force of the waterpower-a huge project, with huge profits to be made, from the power and the enormous silicate deposits. A huge project was started in 1926, not yet completed, though the death tunnel is done. Millions have been spent-$20,000,000 already. Engineers of the company had made tests. The mountains were full of silicate rock. Silicate-valuable, deadly if breathed into the lungs in large amounts. No complete protection against silicate was known, when very fine, as in this case, but there were masks that helped. Ventilation shafts would carry some of the dust away. Also, on the night of December 2, 1984, an accident at the Union Carbide pesticide plant in Bhopal, India, released at least 30 tons of a highly toxic gas called methyl isocyanate, as well as a number of other poisonous gases. Temporary huts or shantytowns that surrounded the pesticide plant lead to more than 600,000 people being exposed to the deadly gas cloud that night. The gases stayed low to the ground, causing victims throats and eyes to burn, inducing nausea, and many deaths. Estimates of the death toll vary from as few as 3,800 to as many as 16,000, but government figures now refer to an estimate of 15,000 killed over the years. Toxic material remains, and 30 years later, many of those who were exposed to the gas have given birth to physically and mentally disabled children. For decades, survivors have been fighting to have the site cleaned up, but they say the efforts were slowed when Michigan-based Dow Chemical took over Union Carbide in 2001. Human rights groups say that t housands of tons of hazardous waste remain buried underground, and the government has conceded the area is contaminated. There has, however, been no long-term epidemiological research, which conclusively proves that birth defects are directly related to the drinking of the contaminated water.[4] Similar (The Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster) Main Cause The environmental and human decision making factors that were associated with the launching of the Space Shuttle Challenger on Jan. 28,1986, the Challenge exploded shortly after liftoff, destroying the vehicle and all of its seven crew members, thus the cause of the problem as noted by Roger Boisjoly, chief engineer at Morton Thiokol was that due to the much cooler temperatures he found that both the primary and secondary-ring seals on the field joint had been blackened due to severe hot gas blowby. As he had recorded earlier in his studies that provided a direct correlation between low temperatures, and the concern that the O-rings on the shuttles solid rocket boosters would stiffen in the cold losing their ability to preform well as a suitably seal. The shuttle solid rocket boosters (or SRBs), are key elements in the operation of the shuttle. Without the boosters, the shuttle cannot produce enough thrust to overcome the earths gravitational pull and achieve orbit. There is an SRB attached to each side of the external fuel tank. Each booster is 149 feet long and 12 feet in diameter. Before ignition, each booster weighs 2 million pounds. Solid rockets in general produce much more thrust per pound than their liquid fuel counterparts. The drawback is that once the solid rocket fuel has been ignited, it cannot be turned off or even controlled. So it was extremely important that the shuttle SRBs were properly designed. Morton Thiokol was awarded the contract to design and build the SRBs in 1974. Thiokols design is a scaled-up version of a Titan missile, which had been used successfully for years. NASA accepted the design in 1976. The booster is comprised of seven hollow metal cylinders. The solid rocket fuel is cast into the cylinders at the Thiokol plant in Utah, and the cylinders are assembled into pairs for transport to Kennedy Space Center in Florida. At KSC, the four booster segments are assembled into a completed booster rocket. The joints where the segments are joined together at KSC are known as field joints (See Figure 1). These field joints consist of a tang and clevis joint., which 177 clevis pins hold the tang and clevis together. Each joint is sealed by two O-rings, the bottom ring known as the primary O-ring, and the top known as the secondary O-ring. (The Titan booster had only one O-ring. The second ring was added as a measure of redundancy since the boosters would be lifting humans into orbit. Except for the increased scale of the rockets diameter, this was the only major difference between the shuttle booster and the Titan booster.) The purpose of the O-rings is to prevent hot combustion gasses from escaping from the inside of the motor. To provide a barrier between the rubber O-rings and the c ombustion gasses, a heat resistant putty is applied to the inner section of the joint prior to assembly. The gap between the tang and the clevis determines the amount of compression on the O-ring. To minimize the gap and increase the squeeze on the O-ring, shims are inserted between the tang and the outside leg of the clevis. [b] In my opinion NASA should have delayed the launch, simply to explore the research that maybe Roger Boisjoly of Morton Thiokol s theory held merit and was based of a scientific observation form such an expert in the field of Rocket Science. Placing myself in that position, protocol would warrant a whistle-blower status as lives and multi-million dollars was a stake, not withholding the reputation of NASA and the Space Program overall. Without knowing the contractual obligation he had as an employee of a company that done work for NASA and the political hoops and legal ramifications that would follow, so out of the choices provided Resigning the position in protest is the only clear option, expect the end result would probably not change. Yet in my opinion Roger Boisjoly of Morton Thiokol did exactly what practically could have been done within reason considering the circumstances. Similar (Water Disaster in Elk River, West Virginia) Main Cause In Elk River, West Virginia on January 9, 2014 a chemical spill various parties initiated numerous legal actions at both the state and federal levels. Community advocates have been at the forefront of state legislation to register never before documented chemical storage tanks. Approximately 50,000 tanks were identified for regulation, many of which were located along West Virginias water supply. The spills fallout and West Virginias lead to create a chemical storage tank regulatory program set a precedent for several other states to enact their own chemical tank legislation and bills were proposed in halls of Congress and the U.S. Senate. [c]Despite immense public support, these West Virginia regulatory bills were already being dismantled by the next legislative session. In addition to legislation intended to prevent similar crises, numerous criminal charges were filed against parties responsible for the spill. The U.S. Attorney for southern West Virginia obtained 15 indictments for up to 93 years in prison against Freedom Industries former president Gary Southern for charges including wire fraud. Although in an FBI-conducted investigation Gary Southern claimed no association with Freedom Industries, he ultimately pled guilty for violating the federal Clean Water Act, the Refuse Act, and negligent for failing to have a pollution prevention plan, and faces up to three years in prison and $300,000 in fines. Among five other Freedom Industries executives who pleaded guilty on charges related to the spill, Dennis Farrell, pleaded guilty to violating the Refuse Act and failing to have a pollution prevention plan, for which he faces sentencing of 30 days to two years in prison and up to $200,000 in fines. Numerous civil suits have been filed in the aftermath of the crisis, including over 50 against West Virginia American Water in just the first nine months following the spill. Several personal injury suits as well as a class action lawsuit against Freedom Industries, its top executives, Eastman Chemical Company, West Virginia American Water, American Water, its parent company. In December 2015, Freedom Industries Farrell and Southern settled one such class action for $50,000 and $350,000 respectively [1] http://cstl-hcb.semo.edu/pgershuny/Gauley%20Bridge.htm [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUL6nnJO-6Q [3] http://cstl-hcb.semo.edu/pgershuny/Gauley%20Bridge.htm [4] https://www.britannica.com/event/Bhopal-disaster [a] http://depts.washington.edu/labhist/laborpress/ [b] http://ethics.tamu.edu/Portals/3/Case%20Studies/Shuttle.pdf [c] https://wvwatercrisis.com/

Saturday, January 18, 2020

Readers Response to John Updike’s A&P Essay

In the summer of 1961 we meet Sammy. Sammy is a 19-year-old clerk at the local A&P in a small town, and one day a few girls walk in, in their bikinis. Everyone in the store either stares at them lustfully or averts their eyes uncomfortably. When the manager gets back he scolds the girls and tells them that they cannot come back in there dressed that way again. So Sammy quits. I personally enjoy this story because of the dated wordplay and the character development. John Updike fleshes out Sammy quite well. We learn that he has been working that the store for some time, and in doing so has noted many peculiarities about the people who frequent it. Having little else to do on a Thursday afternoon, he just looks around and internally judges everyone that he sees. Of an elderly woman who he is assisting at the start of the story he says, â€Å"She’s one of these cash-register-watchers, a witch about fifty with rouge on her cheekbones and no eyebrows, and I know it made her day to trip me up. She’d been watching cash registers for fifty years and probably never seen a mistake before. The story goes on about his observations with only a few bits of dialogue, in which one person is typically talking to someone else, with no real back and forth. I think that Updikes’ decision to keep the majority of the story in Sammy’s mind was interesting to me, and I feel as though it added a lot to the character. It was a very short story set in one place, over a period of about twenty minutes, so most of the success of the character development has to do with his inner monologue. We learn that Sammy is a bored 19 year old who is tired of his job and the predictability of the people in it. When something as unnatural as three scantily clad girls entering a supermarket in the early sixties occurs, the people in the market hardly pay attention. He believes that â€Å"you could set off dynamite in an A & P and the people would by and large keep reaching and checking oatmeal off their lists and muttering â€Å"Let me see, there was a third thing, began with A, asparagus, no , ah, yes, applesauce! † or whatever it is they do mutter. † Right there is a great summation for this character; dark, crude, pessimistic, and overly observant. Other than his witty wordplay, the story was lacking for me. I enjoyed reading it, but it was not the best thing that I have ever read. I feel like there could have been more, Sammy was so talkative in his own head, but then when the girls showed up he was quiet as a mouse. That makes sense for the character, but when he quit and the girls left I feel like there should have been more interaction between him and his manager, or maybe more of his inner thoughts. It is hard to pinpoint, and I would not even begin to know how to fix it, but this story falls short at the end in my opinion.

Friday, January 10, 2020

ndividual Assignment Ethics Reflection Paper Essay

Business Ethics and Social Responsibility Resources: Ethics Awareness Inventory and Ethical Choices in the Workplace assessments Use the Ethics Awareness Inventory and Ethical Choices in the Workplace assessments to revisityour personal and professional values. Write a paper of no more than 1,050-words in which you do the following: †¢ Explain the role of ethics and social responsibility in developing a strategic plan,considering stakeholder needs. †¢ Explain how your ethical perspective has evolved throughout the program. Format your paper according to APA standards. General Questions – General General Questions Take the Ethics Awareness Inventory and Ethical Choices in the Workplace assessments to assess your values. Write a paper between 600 to 700 words in which you do the following: Explain the role of ethics and social responsibility in developing a strategic plan, considering stakeholder needs. Explain how your ethical perspective has evolved throughout the program. Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines. Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment. If you can’t settle on a major in your first year, then take a couple core classes for any major you are considering. You’ll learn about each field thoroughly this way. When you are ready to choose, you’ll have the credits you need for that major, plus the minors as well. This file of STR 581 Week 1 Individual Assignment Ethics Reflection Paper comprises: Business Ethics and Social Responsibility Resources: Ethics Awareness Inventory and Ethical Choices in the Workplace assessments Use the Ethics Awareness Inventory and Ethical Choices in the Workplace a†¦ Follow the link to get tutorial – https://bitly.com/1wyRSFq If you can’t settle on a major in your first year, then take a couple core classes for any major you are considering. You’ll learn about each field thoroughly this way. When you are ready to choose, you’ll have the credits you need for that major, plus the minors as well. General Questions – General General Questions Take the Ethics Awareness Inventory and Ethical Choices in the Workplace assessments to assess your values. Write a paper between 600 to 700 words in which you do the following: Explain the role of ethics and social responsibility in developing a strategic plan, considering stakeholder needs. Explain how your ethical perspective has evolved throughout the program. Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines. Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.